Surfboard comparison
Firewire Sweet Potato vs Slater Designs Sci-Fi 2.0
Also searched as: Sweet Potato vs Sci-Fi 2.0, Firewire Sweet Potato or Slater Designs Sci-Fi 2.0, Slater Designs Sci-Fi 2.0 vs Firewire Sweet Potato
Firewire Sweet Potato vs Slater Designs Sci-Fi 2.0: Firewire Sweet Potato fits knee-high to chest-high days, while Slater Designs Sci-Fi 2.0 holds through waist-high to overhead. Side-by-side wave range, power, and skill on Quivr.
Free on iPhone. Opens straight to Sweet Potato vs Sci-Fi 2.0 — same charts as this page, plus your quiver.
This Sweet Potato vs Sci-Fi 2.0 page compares wave size (knee-high to chest-high vs waist-high to overhead), wave power (soft / mushy vs soft / mushy to punchy), and skill demand using Quivr catalog spectra — the same ranges shown in the app. Quivr catalogs 1,616+ surfboards.
Firewire
Sweet Potato
Groveler
Best for speed + glide
✦ Less-than-ideal conditions.
The Sweet Potato is designed for small waves, offering a fun and fast ride with excellent floatation. It suits surfers looking to maximize their enjoyment in less-than-ideal conditions.
knee-high to chest-high
soft / mushy
intermediate to advanced skill window
Manufacturer
View on Firewire website
Slater Designs
Sci-Fi 2.0
Hybrid
Best for everyday surf
✦ Excels in a variety of conditions.
The Sci-Fi 2.0 excels in a variety of conditions, handling waves up to double overhead while also performing well in smaller, flatter surf. It's designed for surfers looking for a versatile board that offers ease of control and speed.
waist-high to overhead
soft / mushy to punchy
intermediate to advanced skill window
Manufacturer
View on Slater Designs website
Still deciding?
Save this matchup in Quivr
Open Sweet Potato vs Sci-Fi 2.0 in the app, add either board to your quiver, and compare against 1,616+ others. Free on iPhone.
Sweet Potato vs Sci-Fi 2.0 — quick answers
What's the difference between Firewire Sweet Potato and Slater Designs Sci-Fi 2.0?
Firewire Sweet Potato vs Slater Designs Sci-Fi 2.0: Firewire Sweet Potato fits knee-high to chest-high days, while Slater Designs Sci-Fi 2.0 holds through waist-high to overhead. Side-by-side wave range, power, and skill on Quivr.
What wave size is Sweet Potato for?
Firewire Sweet Potato covers knee-high to chest-high.
What wave size is Sci-Fi 2.0 for?
Slater Designs Sci-Fi 2.0 covers waist-high to overhead.
Which is better for small waves, Firewire Sweet Potato or Slater Designs Sci-Fi 2.0?
Firewire Sweet Potato is tuned for a smaller top-end (knee-high to chest-high) than Slater Designs Sci-Fi 2.0 (waist-high to overhead).
Free on the App Store
OPEN SWEET POTATO VS SCI-FI 2.0 IN QUIVR
You already read the spectra. Download Quivr and open Sweet Potato vs Sci-Fi 2.0 next to 1,616+ more boards — same ranges, your quiver, real reviews.
Free on iPhone. Built for choosing and comparing boards.